AI-created heritage and its relationships with cultural rights

Inês de Carvalho Costa

doi:10.14568/cp35996

Autores

Inês de Carvalho Costa Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Porto, Portugal; Transdisciplinary Research Centre «Culture, Space, Memory», Via Panorâmica, s/n, 4150-564, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8851-828X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14568/cp35996

Palavras-chave:

Acessibilidade, Inteligência artificial, Direitos de autor, Ética, Direitos humanos

Resumo

Com o aumento exponencial da Inteligência artificial (IA), o campo do património deve refletir acerca de um conjunto de oportunidades, desafios e riscos ainda pouco definidos. Ao propormos e testarmos o conceito de “património criado por IA”, pretendemos identificar as conexões entre a IA, o património e os direitos humanos, mais precisamente, os direitos culturais. A nossa metodologia consiste num estado da arte acerca da matéria, na clarificação do seu quadro conceptual, normativo e na análise de exemplos internacionais que têm suscitado interesse e preocupação em matéria de acessibilidade, direitos de autor e ética. A seleção de exemplos seguiu três critérios: impacto mediático, pertinência e novidade. Guiada pelos princípios de “future-thinking”, esta abordagem permite alargar o debate acerca do desenvolvimento de diretrizes éticas e dos direitos culturais face a futuros cenários dominados pela IA.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

1. Carnide, B., ‘A inteligência artificial e a arte: combater o medo com o medo’, in Comunidade Cultura e Arte (2023), https://comunidadeculturaearte.com/a-inteligencia-artificial-e-a-arte-combater-o-medo-com-o-medo/ (accessed 2024-05-19).

2. Carnide, B., ‘January: AI cinematic short film - 100% Artificial Intelligence’, in Youtube (2023), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X706nnsUBI&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fcomunidadeculturaearte.com%2F&source_ve_path=OTY3MTQ&feature=emb_imp_woyt (accessed 2024-05-19).

3. Duffy, C., ‘An author says AI is “writing” unauthorized books being sold under her name on Amazon’, in CNN (2023), https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/10/tech/ai-generated-books-amazon/index.html (accessed 2024-05-14).

4. Howell, B. A., ‘Case 1:22-cv-01564-BAH’, in EntCloud, United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2023/08/18), https://www.copyright.gov/ai/docs/district-court-decision-affirming-refusal-of-registration.pdf (accessed 2026-01-11).

5. Berg, S.; Fiedler, E., Cultural heritage: perspectives, challenges and future directions, Nova Science Publishers, New York (2017).

6. Holtorf, C.; Högberg, A. (eds.), Cultural heritage and the future, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, United Kingdom (2021).

7. Bordoni, L.; Mele, F.; Sorgente, A., Artificial Intelligence for cultural heritage, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2016).

8. European Parliament, ‘Briefing: Artificial intelligence in the context of Cultural Heritage and museums - Complex challenges and new opportunities’ (2023), in EuroParl, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/747120/EPRS_BRI(2023)747120_EN.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

9. Caramiaux, B., ‘AI with museums and cultural heritage’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 117-130.

10. Münster, S.; Maiwald, F.; Lenardo, I. D.; Henriksson, J.; Isaac, A.; Graf, M. M.; Beck, C.; Oomen, J., ‘Artificial intelligence for digital heritage innovation: setting up a R&D agenda for europe’, Heritage 7(2) (2024) 794-816, https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7020038.

11. Neudecker, C., ‘Digital curation and AI: opportunities and risks for cultural heritage institutions’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 149-162.

12. Council of Europe Commissionaire for Human Rights, ‘Unboxing Artificial Intelligence: 10 steps to protect Human Rights: Recommendation’, in Council of Europe (2019), https://rm.coe.int/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights-reco/1680946e64 (accessed 2024-05-14).

13. Pansoni, S.; Tiribelli, S.; Paolanti, M.; Di Stefano, F.; Frontoni, E.; Malinverni, E.; Giovanola, B., ‘Artificial intelligence and cultural heritage: design and assessment of an ethical framework’, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLVIII(M-2) (2023) 1149-1155, https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1149-2023.

14. Smith, L.; Logan, W., ‘Series general co-editors foreword’, in Cultural diversity, heritage, and human rights: intersections in theory and practice, ed. M. Langfield; W. Logan & M. Craith, Routledge - Taylors & Francis Group, London (2010) xiv-xv.

15. Vrdoljak, A. F.; Liuzza, C.; Meskell, L., ‘UNESCO, world heritage, and human rights compliance’, Duke Global Working Paper Series 44 (2021), https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3984329 (accessed 2024-05-14).

16. Soares, I. V. P.; Cureau, S. (eds.), Bens culturais e direitos humanos, Edições Sesc, São Paulo (2019).

17. Kapchan, D. (ed.), Cultural heritage in transit: intangible rights as human rights, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2014).

18. Langfield, M.; Logan, W.; Craith, M. (eds.), Cultural diversity, heritage, and human rights: intersections in theory and practice, Routledge - Taylors & Francis Group, London (2010).

19. Silverman, H.; Ruggles, F. D. (eds.), Cultural heritage and human rights, Springer, New York (2007).

20. UNESCO; IRCAI, ‘Challenging systematic prejudices: an investigation into gender bias in large language models’, in UNESCO Digital Library, UNESCO, Paris (2024), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388971 (accessed 2024-05-14).

21. European Parliament, ‘P9_TA(2024)0138: Artificial Intelligence Act’, in European Parliament, European Parliament, s.l. (2024), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

22. European Commission, ‘White Paper: On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust’, in EUR-lex, European Commission, Brussels (2020), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0065 (accessed 2024-05-14).

23. Assembleia da República. ‘Lei nº 27/2021, de 17 de maio: Carta Portuguesa de Direitos Humanos na Era Digital’, in Procuradoria-Geral da Distrital de Lisboa, Assembleia da República (2021), https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?artigo_id=3446A0001&nid=3446&tabela=lei_velhas&pagina=1&ficha=1&so_miolo=&nversao=1 (accessed 2024-05-14).

24. Silva, J. P., Direitos fundamentais para o universo digital, Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, Lisboa (2024).

25. NEMO, ‘European museum sector presents three recommendations addressing the development of artificial intelligence technology in museums to policymakers’, in NE-MO, NEMO, Brussels (2024), https://www.ne-mo.org/fileadmin/Dateien/public/NEMO_Press/NEMO_Museums_and_AI_Recommendations_press-release.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

26. Thiel, S.; Bernhardt, J. C. (eds.), AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024).

27. Neudecker, C., ‘Cultural heritage as data: digital curation and artificial intelligence in libraries’, Ceur-Ws 3234 (2022) paper 2, https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3234/paper2.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

28. Tarrant, D.; Maddison, J; Thereaux, O., ‘Data ethics canvas’, in ODI -Open Data Institute (2021), https://theodi.org/insights/tools/the-data-ethics-canvas-2021/ (accessed 2024-05-14).

29. The Museums, + Ai Network, AI: a museum planning toolkit, University of London, London (2020).

30. UNESCO; COMEST, ‘Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence’, in UNESDOC, UNESCO & COMEST, Paris (2019), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367823 (accessed 2024-05-14).

31. Floridi, L.; Cowls, J.; Beltrametti, M.; Chatila, R.; Chazerand, P.; Dignum, V.; Luetge, C.; Madelin, R.; Pagallo, U.; Rossi, F.; Schafer, B.; Valcke, P.; Vayena, E., ‘Ai4people - An ethical framework for a good ai society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations’, Minds and Machines 28 (2018) 689-707, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.

32. Bunz, M., ‘The role of culture in the intelligence of AI’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 23-30.

33. Hajri, O., ‘The hidden costs of AI: decolonization from practice back to theory’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 57-64.

34. Yasar, B., ‘Hollywood’s portrayal of artificial intelligence’, in Research Center TRTWorld, TRTWorld Research Center, Istanbul-London-Washington DC (2024), https://researchcentre.trtworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Hollywood-Portrayal-AI.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

35. UNESCO, ‘Charter on the preservation of the digital heritage’, in UNESDOC, UNESCO, Paris (2009), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529 (accessed 2024-05-14).

36. UNESCO, ‘Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage’, in UNESDOC, UNESCO, Paris (1972), https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf (accessed 2024-05-14).

37. UNESCO, ‘Cultural landscapes’, in UNESCO World Heritage Convention, UNESCO, Paris (1992), https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/ (accessed 2024-05-14).

38. UNESCO, ‘Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence’, in OHCHR, UNESCO, Paris (2022), https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/UNESCO.pdf (accessed 2024-05-19).

39. Preiβ, C.; Hofmann, Y., ‘Say the image, don’t make it: Empowering human-AI co-creation through the interactive installation wishing well’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 245-256.

40. Thiel, S., ‘Managing ai: developing strategic and ethical guidelines for museums’, in AI in museums: reflections, perspectives, and applications, eds. S. Thiel & J. C. Bernhardt, Transcript, Bielefeld (2024) 83-98.

41. UN, ‘International covenant on social, economic, and cultural rights’, in OHCHR, (1966), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights (accessed 2024-05-19).

42. Thaler, S., ‘A recent entrance to paradise’(2016), in Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_Recent_Entrance_to_Paradise.jpg (accessed 2024-05-19).