Beyond the 1964 Venice Charter: cultural heritage as regeneration (ever changing never less than whole)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14568/cp37063Keywords:
Anthropocene, Climate change, Cultural heritage management, Heritage futures, People-centred approaches, Post-human perspectivesAbstract
In the age of climate change, even cultural heritage and the meaning of the past must be rethought to meet contemporary and future needs. This task is already being addressed encompassing studies of cultural heritage in relation to the Anthropocene, people-centred approaches, and post-human perspectives, which I build on here. From an archaeological perspective, I ask what it means to imagine a framework for cultural heritage that is inspired by the notion of regeneration embracing continuous change and transformation in relation to both natural and cultural heritage. In this perspective, what matters is not safeguarding authentic remains of the past such as monuments and sites, but to ensure the preconditions for the wellbeing of fellow human and non-human beings living under changing circumstances in the present and the future. I conclude with discussion of some implications of what such a life-centred perspective may mean for future practices of heritage management beyond central principles of the 1964 Venice Charter.
Downloads
References
1. Muñoz Viñas, S., Contemporary Theory of Conservation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2005).
2. Lingle, A.; Henderson, J.; Fredheim, H., ‘Imbuing principles of care: reflecting on the impact of Venice and Nara in the United Kingdom’, China Cultural Heritage 123(5) (2024) 54-66, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/175734 (accessed 2024-07-21).
3. Mager, T., ‘The Venice Charter in the age of climate change’, Protection of Cultural Heritage 20 (2024) 93-102, https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.6138.
4. ICOMOS, ‘The Nara document on authenticity’, ICOMOS, Paris (1994), https://publ.icomos.org/publicomos/technica/2F347E381BE10CFAF370B3D3A9453C91 (accessed 2024-06-18).
5. Fredengren, C., ‘NATURE:CULTURES – heritage, sustainability and feminist posthumanism’, Current Swedish Archaeology 23(1) (2015) 109-130, https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2015.09.
6. Fredengren, C., ‘Thinking with soil in heritage matters’, Landscape Research 50(2) (2025) 274-287, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2024.2424601.
7. Harvey, D.; Perry, J. (eds.), The future of heritage as climate change: loss, adaptation and creativity, Routledge, London - New York (2015).
8. Lafrenz Samuels, K., Mobilizing heritage: anthropological practice and transnational prospects, University Press of Florida, Gainesville (2018).
9. Sterling, C., ‘Critical heritage and the posthumanities: problems and prospects’, International Journal of Heritage Studies 26(11) (2020) 1029-1046, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1715464.
10. Shepherd, N. (ed.), Rethinking heritage in precarious times: coloniality, climate change, and covid-19, Routledge, London - New York (2023), https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188438.
11. Holtorf, C., ‘The climate heritage paradox − how rethinking archaeological heritage can address global challenges of climate change’, World Archaeology 55(3) (2023) 268-281, https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2024.2320122.
12. Simon, Z. B., ‘Does the past still matter?’, in Engaging with the past and present: the relationship between past and present across the disciplines, ed. P.M. Dover, Routledge, London - New York (2023) 43-55, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003026570.
13. Pétursdóttir, Þ., ‘Climate change? Archaeology and anthropocene’, Archaeological Dialogues 24(2) (2017) 175-205, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203817000216.
14. Thompson, J.; Wijesuriya, G., ‘From “sustaining heritage” to “heritage sustaining broader societal wellbeing and benefits”: an ICCROM perspective’, in World heritage and sustainable development: new directions in world heritage management, eds. P. B. Larsen & W. Logan, Routledge, London - New York (2018) 180-195, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108049.
15. Holtorf, C., ‘Embracing change: how cultural resilience is increased through cultural heritage’, World Archaeology 50(4) (2018) 639-650, https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1510340.
16. United Nations, Pact for the Future (2024), https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-pact_for_the_future_adopted.pdf.
17. Shepherd, N.; Cohen, J. B.; Carmen, W.; Chundu, M.; Ernsten, C.; Guevara, O.; Haas, F.; Hussain, S. T.: Riede, F.; Siders, A. R.; Singh, C.; Sithole, P.; Troi, A., ICSM CHC white Paper III − The role of cultural and natural heritage for climate action: contribution of impacts group III to the international co-sponsored meeting on culture, heritage and climate change, ICOMOS & ISCM CHC, Charenton-le-Pont and Paris (2022), https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2719 (accessed 2024-06-18).
18. DeSilvey, C.; Fredheim, H.; Fluck, H.; Hails, R.; Harrison, R.; Samuel, I.; Blundell, A., ‘When loss is more: from managed decline to adaptive release’, The Historic Environment 12(3-4) (2021) 418-433, https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2021.1957263.
19. Bandarin, F., Changing heritage: how internal tensions and external pressures are threatening our cultural and natural legacy, Routledge, London - New York (2024).
20. Fatorić, S.; Daly, C., ‘Towards a climate-smart cultural heritage management’, WIREs Climate Change 14(6) (2023) e855, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.855.
21. Seekamp, E.; Jo, E., ‘Resilience and transformation of heritage sites to accommodate for loss and learning in a changing climate’, Climatic Change 162(2020) 41-55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02812-4.
22. Daly, C., ‘Climate action and world heritage: conflict or confluence?’, in 50 years world heritage convention: shared responsibility − Conflict & reconciliation, eds. M.-T. Albert, R. Bernecker, C. Cave, A. C. Prodan, & M. Ripp, Springer, Cham (2022) 239-251, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05660-4_19.
23. Clarke, J., Haour, A., Morel, H., Forster, J., Orlove, B., Holtorf, C., Hutcheson, A., Aryee Adinorkuor, V., Brunnschweiler, C., Brooks, N., Wade, S., Wellington, N., Appeaning Addo, K.; Simpson, N. P., ‘Curating transformation can strengthen adaptation and minimize losses and damages’, npj Climate Action 4 (2025) 4, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00210-z.
24. Mach, K. J.; Siders, A. R., ‘Reframing strategic, managed retreat for transformative climate adaptation’, Science 372(6548) (2021) 1294-1299, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh1894.
25. DeSilvey, C., Curated decay: heritage beyond saving, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis and London (2017).
26. Lambrechts, L.; Lindström, K., Hansen van der Watt, L.-M.; Pitta, F.; Deane, N.; Moreschi, B.; Petersen, L., ‘Decay without mourning: future-thinking heritage practices’, International Journal of Heritage Studies 31(3) (2024) 340-357, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2417062.
27. Holtorf, C., ‘Averting loss aversion in cultural heritage’, International Journal of Heritage Studies 21(4) (2015) 405-421, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.938766.
28. Holtorf, C., ‘Conservation and heritage as creative processes of future-making’, International Journal of Cultural Property 27(si 2) (2020) 277-290, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739120000107.
29. Araoz, G., ‘World-heritage historic urban landscapes: defining and protecting authenticity’, APT Bulletin 39(2-3) (2008) 33-37, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25433949 (accessed 2024-06-22).
30. Harrison, R.; DeSilvey, C.; Holtorf, C.; Macdonald, S.; Bartolini, N.; Breithoff, E.; Fredheim, H.; Lyons, A.; May, S.; Morgan, J.; Penrose, S., Heritage futures: comparative approaches to natural and cultural heritage practices, UCL Press, London (2020), https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787356009.
31. Perry, J.; Gordon, I. J., ‘Adaptive heritage: is this creative thinking or abandoning our values?’, Climate 9(8) (2021) 128, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9080128.
32. Fouseki, K., Heritage dynamics: understanding and adapting to change in diverse heritage contexts, UCL Press, London (2022), https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787358331.
33. Brown, S.; Goetcheus, C. (eds.), Routledge handbook of cultural landscape practice, Routledge, London - New York (2023), https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203119.
34. Holtorf, C., ‘Regenerating heritage processes and practices in historical reconstruction’, in The Routledge companion to the philosophy of architectural reconstruction, eds. Z. Somhegyi & L. Giombini, Routledge, London - New York (2024) 97-106, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334200-10.
35. Jones, S.; Yarrow, T., The object of conservation: an ethnography of heritage practice, Routledge, London - New York (2022).
36. Stiefel, B. L., ‘Heritage, biophilic reconstruction, a climate change’, in The routledge companion to the philosophy of architectural reconstruction, eds. Z. Somhegyi & L. Giombini, Routledge, London - New York (2024) 135-149, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334200-13.
37. Holtorf, C., ‘An archaeology of growth and regeneration’, in Under storkökets golv. Arkeologisk undersökning i Gamla Skogsby september och oktober 2021, ed. L. Papmehl-Dufay, Linnaeus University, Kalmar - Växjö (2022) 85-123, https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-119409 (accessed 2024-05-14).
38. Flor, J., Ever changing and never twice the same: Robert Irwin/Central Garden, lecture, Getty Centre, Los Angeles (2024).
39. Weschler, L., Robert Irwin Getty Garden, J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles (2020).
40. Jessen, I.; Senkpiel, F. (eds.), Lexikon der Lebensmittel als Kunstmaterial, Hatje Cantz, Berlin (2024).
41. Vocabulary.com, Vocabulary.com - Learn Words - English Dictionary (accessed 2024-05-14).
42. Farstadvoll, S., ‘Mold, weeds and plastic lanterns: ecological aftermath in a derelict garden’, in Heritage ecologies, eds. T. R. Bangstad & Þ. Pétursdóttir, Routledge, London - New York (2022) 327-349, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315101019.
43. Farstadvoll, S., ‘Growing concerns: plants and their roots in the past’, Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 5(2) (2018) 174-193, https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.35117.
44. Ingold, T., The rise and fall of generation now, Polity, Cambridge - Hoboken (2024).
45. Brown, S., ‘From preservation to change management and transformation’, in Routledge handbook of cultural landscape practice, eds. S. Brown & C. Goetcheus, Routledge, London - New York (2023) 32-46, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203119.
46. Holmstedt, J., ‘Humus economicus’, in More posthuman glossary, eds. R. Braidotti, E. Jones & G. Klumbyte, Bloomsbury, London (2023) 62-64, https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/more-posthuman-glossary-9781350231429 (accessed 2024-07-09).
47. Domaṅska, E., ‘History, anthropogenic soil, and unbecoming human’, in Dipesh Chakrabarty and the global South, eds. S. Dube, S. Seth & A. Skaria, Routledge, London - New York (2020) 201-214, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199745.
48. Wall Kimmerer, R., ‘Building good soil’, in What kind of ancestor do you want to be?, eds. J. Hausdoerffer, B. P. Hecht, M. K. Nelson & K. K. Cummings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2021) 182-184, https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226777573-034.
49. Wall Kimmerer, R., Braiding sweetgrass, Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis (2013).
50. Lowenthal, D., The heritage crusade and the spoils of history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
51. Smith, L., Uses of heritage, Routledge, London and New York (2006).
52. Holtorf, C., ‘Perceiving the past: from age value to pastness’, International Journal of Cultural Property 24(4) (2017) 497-515, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739117000236.
53. Madgin, R.; Lesh, J., ‘Exploring emotional attachments to historic places: bridging concept, practice and method’, in People-centred methodologies for heritage conservation, eds. R. Madgin & J. Lesh, Routledge, London - New York (2021) 1-15, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345807.
54. UNESCO, The Hangzhou declaration: placing culture at the heart of sustainable development policies, UNESCO, Paris (2013), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000221238 (accessed 2024-06-18).
55. Farrier, D., Footprints: in search of future fossils, 4th Estate, London (2020).
56. Fredengren, C., ‘Posthumanism, the transcorporeal, and biomolecular archaeology’, Current Swedish Archaeology 21 (2013) 53-71, https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2013.08.
57. Van der Veen, M., ‘The materiality of plants: plant-people entanglements’, World Archaeology 46(5) (2014) 799-812, https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2014.953710.
58. Ingold, T., ‘No more ancient; no more human: the future past of archaeology and anthropology’, in Archaeology and anthropology: understanding similarity, exploring difference, eds. D. Garrow & T. Yarrow, Oxbow, Oxford (2010) 160-170, https://dokumen.pub/archaeology-and-anthropology-understanding-similarity-exploring-difference-illustrated-1842173871-9781842173879.html (accessed 2024-06-20).
59. Macfarlane, R., Underland: a deep time journey, Penguin, London (2020).
60. Walsh, M. J.; O'Neill, S.; Prentiss, A. M.; Willerslev, R.; Riede, F.; Jordan, P. D., ‘Ideas with histories: traditional knowledge evolves’, Arctic 76(1) (2023) 26-47, https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic76991.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
This work is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium following no commercial or derivatives, provided the original author and source are credited.
Copyright remains with the authors.
