pXRF: técnica não invasiva para identificar pigmentos em pinturas artísticas com multicamadas

Autores

  • Rosario Blanc Research Group of Analytical Chemistry and Life Sciences, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-9133
  • Eloisa Manzano Research Group of Analytical Chemistry and Life Sciences, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-4661
  • José Luis Vílchez Research Group of Analytical Chemistry and Life Sciences, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-6390

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14568/cp41924

Palavras-chave:

XRF portátil, Amostra padrão em multicamadas, Cinábrio, Azurite, Amarelo cádmio, Branco de chumbo

Resumo

A fluorescência de raios X portátil (pXRF) é uma ferramenta analítica poderosa; no entanto, a sua aplicação na análise de misturas complexas de pigmentos e pinturas artísticas com várias camadas − particularmente sistemas ternários e quaternários distribuídos por uma ou mais camadas − ainda apresenta desafios significativos. Este estudo investiga a eficácia da pXRF na deteção de pigmentos específicos, como azurite, vermelhão e branco de chumbo, em misturas complexas e camadas estratigráficas sobrepostas, comum em pinturas históricas e esculturas policromáticas. O amarelo de cádmio, um pigmento muito usado em períodos posteriores como sobrepintura, também foi identificado, mostrando a utilidade do pXRF para analisar obras de arte históricas, mesmo quando se trata de adições ou restauros posteriores. As informações obtidas com as réplicas experimentais foram posteriormente usadas para analisar duas pinturas históricas selecionadas como casos de estudo. Os pigmentos identificados estão distribuídos de forma heterogénea e misturados em proporções variadas.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

1. West, M.; Ellis, A.T.; Potts, P. J.; Streli, C.; Vanhoof, C.; Wobrauschek, P., ‘Atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and their applications’, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 30(9) (2015) 1839-1889, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5JA90033F.

2. Blanc, R.; Manzano, E.; López-Montes, A.; Domínguez-Gasca, N.; Vílchez, J.L., ‘Non-invasive study of the pigments of a painting on copper with the inscription “Boceto di Pablo Veronese” on the back’, Heritage 6(6) (2023) 4787-4801, https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6060254.

3. Leutenegger, P.; Longoni, A.; Fiorini, C.; Strüder, L.; Kemmer, J.; Lechner, P.; Cesareo, R., ‘Works of art investigation with silicon drift detectors’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 439(2-3) (2000) 458-470, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00908-0.

4. Ferrero, J. L.; Roldan, C.; Ardid, M.; Navarro, E., ‘X-ray fluorescence analysis of yellow pigments in altarpieces by Valencian artists of the XV and XVI centuries’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 422(1-3) (1999) 868-873, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01125-5.

5. Orsilli, J.; Caglio S., ‘Combined scanned macro X-ray fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy mapping on corroded ancient bronzes’, Minerals 14(2) (2024) 192-205, https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020192.

6. Alberghina, M. F.; Zicarelli, M. A.; Randazzo, L.; Schiavone, S.; La Russa, M. F.; Labriola, M.; Ricca, M., ‘Byzantine wall paintings from San Marco d’Alunzio, Sicily: non-invasive diagnostics and microanalytical investigation of pigments and plasters’, Heritage Science 12(1) (2024) 184-201, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01308-z.

7. Harth, A., ‘X-ray fluorescence (XRF) on painted heritage objects: a review using topic modeling’, Heritage Science 12(1) (2024) 17-29, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01135-2.

8. Bonizzoni, L.; Colombo, C.; Ferrati, S.; Gargano, M.; Greco, M.; Ludwig, N.; Realini, M., ‘A critical analysis of the application of EDXRF spectrometry on complex stratigraphies’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 40(4) (2011) 247-253, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1320.

9. Tykot, R., ‘Using non-destructive portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometers on stone, ceramics, metals, and other materials in museums: advantages and limitations’, Applied Spectroscopy 70(1) (2016) 42-56, https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702815616745.

10. Shugar, A. N.; Mass, J. L., Handheld XRF for art and archaeology, Leuven University Press, Leuven (2012).

11. Sugihara, K.; Tamura, K.; Satoh, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Hirao, Y.; Miura, S.; Tokugawa, Y., ‘Analysis of pigments used in scroll paintings of a national treasure “Tale of Genji” using a portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer’, Advances in X-ray Analysis 44 (2001) 432-441.

12. Bettinelli, M.; Taina, P., ‘Rapid analysis of coal fly ash by x‐ray fluorescence spectrometry’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 19(5) (1990) 227-232, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1300190505.

13. Ferrero, J. L.; Roldán, C.; Juanes, D.; Rollano, E.; Morera, C., ‘Analysis of pigments from Spanish works of art using a portable EDXRF spectrometer’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 31(6) (2002) 441-447, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.604.

14. Frahm; E., Doonan, R.C., ‘The technological versus methodological revolution of portable XRF in archaeology’, Journal of Archaeological Science 40(2) (2013) 1425-1434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.013.

15. Galli, A.; Bonizzoni, L., ‘True versus forged in the cultural heritage materials: the role of analysis’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 43(1) (2014) 22-28, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2461.

16. Manhas, M.; Tomar, A.; Tiwari, M.; Sharma, S., ‘Application of X‐ray fluorescence in forensic archaeology: a review’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 54(1) (2025) 26-37, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3421.

17. Fontana, D.; Alberghina, M. F.; Barraco, R.; Basile, S.; Tranchina, L.; Brai, M.; Troja, S. O., ‘Historical pigments characterisation by quantitative X-ray fluorescence’, Journal of Cultural Heritage 15(3) (2014) 266-274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.07.001.

18. Shibata, Y.; Suyama, J.; Kitano, M.; Nakamura, T., ‘X‐ray fluorescence analysis of Cr, As, Se, Cd, Hg, and Pb in soil using pressed powder pellet and loose powder methods’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 38(5) (2009) 410-416, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1195.

19. Narman Han, E.; Boydaş, E., ‘Characterization of matrix effects for Pb L-shell energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) in binary compounds of cadmium, copper, molybdenum, and zinc’, Instrumentation Science & Technology 49(6) (2021) 616-62, https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2021.1923029.

20. Bonizzoni, L., ‘ED-XRF analysis for cultural heritage: is quantitative evaluation always essential?’, Journal of Physics Conference Series 630(1) (2015) 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/630/1/012001.

21. Mantler, M.; Schreiner, M., ‘X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry in art and archaeology’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 29(1) (2000) 3-17, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(200001/02)29:1%3C3::AID-XRS398%3E3.0.CO;2-O.

22. De Viguerie, L.; Sole, V. A.; Walter, P., ‘Multilayers quantitative X-ray fluorescence analysis applied to easel paintings’, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 395 (2009) 2015-2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2997-0.

23. Bonizzoni, L.; Galli, A.; Milazzo, M., ‘XRF analysis without sampling of Etruscan depurata pottery for provenance classification’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 39(5) (2010) 346-352, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1263.

24. Giurlani, W.; Berretti, E.; Lavacchi, A.; Innocenti, M., ‘Thickness determination of metal multilayers by ED-XRF multivariate analysis using Monte Carlo simulated standards’, Analitica Chimica Acta 1130 (2020) 72-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.047.

25. Pessanha, S.; Guilherme, A.; Carvalho, M. L., ‘Comparison of matrix effects on portable and stationary XRF spectrometers for cultural heritage samples’, Applied Physics A 97 (2009) 497-505, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5251-x.

26. Manzano, E.; Blanc, R.; Martin-Ramos, J. D.; Chiari, G.; Sarrazin, P.; Vilchez, J. L., ‘A combination of invasive and non-invasive techniques for the study of the palette and painting structure of a copy of Raphael’s Transfiguration of Christ’, Heritage Science 9 (2021) 150, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00623-z.

27. Cesareo, R.; De Assis, J. T.; Roldán, C.; Bustamante, A. D.; Brunetti, A.; Schiavon, N., ‘Multilayered samples reconstructed by measuring Kα/Kβ or Lα/Lβ X-ray intensity ratios by EDXRF’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 312 (2013) 15-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.06.019.

28. Karimi, M.; Amiri, N.; Tabbakh Shabani, A. A., ‘Thickness measurement of coated Ni on brass plate using Kα/Kβ ratio by XRF spectrometry’, X‐Ray Spectrometry 38(3) (2009) 234-238, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1146.

29. Martín-Ramos, J. D.; Zafra-Gómez, A.; Vílchez, J. L., ‘Non-destructive pigment characterization in the painting Little Madonna of Foligno by X-ray powder diffraction’, Microchemical Journal 134 (2017) 343-353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.07.001.

30. Feller, R. L., Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics, vol. 47, National Gallery of Art, Washington (1986).

31. Mosca, S.; Frizzi, T.; Pontone, M.; Alberti, R.; Bombelli, L.; Capogrosso, V.; Nevin, A.; Valentini, G.; Comelli, D., ‘Identification of pigments in different layers of illuminated manuscripts by X-ray fluorescence mapping and Raman spectroscopy’, Microchemical Journal 124 (2016) 775-784, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2015.10.038.

32. Ruberto, C.; Mazzinghi, A.; Massi, M.; Castelli, L.; Czelusniak, C.; Palla, L.; Gelli N.; Betuzzi, M.; Impallaria, A.; Brancaccio, R.; Peccenini, E.; Raffaelli, M., ‘Imaging study of Raffaello’s “La Muta” by a portable XRF spectrometer’, Microchemical Journal 126 (2016) 63-69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2015.11.037.

33. Shackley, M. S., ‘An introduction to X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology’, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology, ed. M. S. Shackley, Springer, New York (2012) 18-24.

Schematic structure of the model samples: a) in the first layer; b) second layer; c) third layer; d) the outline of its stratigraphic layout and e) the final state of the model sample. Red − HgS, blue - Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2, yellow − CdS, grey − (PbCO3)2·Pb(OH)2 and white − canvas. The size of each cell is 2.5 × 5 cm.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-06-02

Como Citar

Blanc, R., Manzano, E., & Vílchez, J. L. (2026). pXRF: técnica não invasiva para identificar pigmentos em pinturas artísticas com multicamadas. Conservar Património. https://doi.org/10.14568/cp41924