Digital modelling as a tool for multidisciplinary study – the case of a rare sixteenth-century metallic globe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14568/cp42134Keywords:
3D modelling, Scientific instruments, History of science, Preventive conservation, Public engagementAbstract
While digital modelling of heritage objects has become standard practice, its multidisciplinary potential warrants greater emphasis. Using the case study of a rare Renaissance metallic celestial globe in Portugal, this article highlights the wide-ranging benefits of digitization across three key areas: historical research, conservation support, and public outreach. It underscores the importance of involving historians, digitization specialists, curators, and conservation professionals from the outset − both in prioritizing objects for modelling and in defining the criteria for digitization. The article advocates for a broad and inclusive perspective, encouraging awareness of the diverse disciplines that can benefit from digital models, whether in immediate applications or future research.
Downloads
References
1. Ramos Carrillo, A.; Moreno Toral, E.; Ruiz Altaba, R., ‘Historical-scientific heritage and the university: the two pillars of the History of Pharmacy collection in the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Seville’, Conservar Património 45 (2024) 36-49, https://doi.org/10.14568/cp28835.
2. Suay-Matallana, I., ‘The material culture of the customs laboratory of Lisbon’, Conservar Património 30 (2019) 131-139, https://doi.org/10.14568/cp2018001.
3. Lourenço, M. C.; Wilson, L., ‘Scientific heritage: reflections on its nature and new approaches to preservation, study and access’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44(4) (2013) 744-753, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.07.011.
4. Lourenço, M. C. (ed.), O Laboratorio chimico da Escola Politécnica de Lisboa. História, colecções, conservação e musealização, Museus da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa (2013).
5. Magnolo, S.; Galán-Pérez, A., ‘Theoretical perspectives: sociology and the conservation of scientific heritage’, Frontiers in Sociology 9 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1473206.
6. Schröter, J.; Foasso, C.; Bellot-Gurlet, L.; Brambilla, L., ‘Investigating five totalizing counters manufactured by the Alphonse Darras company of the CNAM collections in Paris’, Conservar Património 44 (2023) 90-102, https://doi.org/10.14568/cp29230.
7. Lourenço, M. C.; Gessner, S., ‘Documenting collections: cornerstones for more history of science in museums’, Science & Education 23 (2014) 727-745, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9568-z.
8. Aguila, E.; Vargiolu, R.; Zahouani, H., ‘Étude de l’usure des mécanismes d’horlogerie antiques : application à la restauration du «Tellurium» (1819)’, poster, 28èmes Journées Internationales Francophones de Tribologie (JIFT), École Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Saint-Etienne (2016), https://jift2016.sciencesconf.org/100810.html (accessed 2018-10-14).
9. Tissot, I.; Manso, M., ‘Industrial heritage: new paradigms for new conservation challenges’, in Current approaches, solutions and practices in conservation of Cultural Heritage, eds. G. Emre, A. Yilmz, P. Pogliani, G. Ildiz & R. Fausto, Istanbul University Press, Istanbul (2024) 159-176, https://doi.org/10.26650/B/AA9PS34.2024.006.008.
10. Caleca, M.; Meíja Muñoz, N.; Pollak, E.; Rodriguez Plassa, A., ‘The sounds of Jean Tinguely: acoustic imaging as a tool for the kinetic art conservation’, student report, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Zurich (2023), https://digital.wpi.edu/concern/student_works/pr76f771d (accessed 2026-03).
11. Hess, A., ‘Authenticity, alterations and museum objects: A close encounter with 2LO, the BBC’s first radio transmitter’, Journal of Material Culture 22(3) (2017) 281-298, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183517702685.
12. Lemos, M.; Tissot, I., ‘Reflection on the conservation challenges of scientific and technological objects’, Conservar Património 33 (2020) 24-31, https://doi.org/10.14568/cp2018044.
13. Agosto, E.; Bornaz, L., ‘3D models in cultural heritage: approaches for their creation and use’, International Journal of Computational Methods in Heritage Science 1(1) (2017) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCMHS.2017010101.
14. Lanteri, L.; Calandra, S.; Briani, F.; Germinario, C.; Izzo, F.; Pagano, S.; Pelosi, C.; Santo, A. P., ‘3D photogrammetric survey, raking light photography and mapping of degradation phenomena of the early renaissance wall paintings by Saturnino Gatti − case study of the St. Panfilo Church in Tornimparte (L’Aquila, Italy)’, Applied Sciences 13(9) (2023) 5689, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095689.
15. Acke, L.; De Vis, K.; Verwulgen, S.; Verlinden, J., ‘Survey and literature study to provide insights on the application of 3D technologies in objects conservation and restoration’, Journal of Cultural Heritage 49 (2021) 272-288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.12.003.
16. Makris, D.; Sakellariou, C.; Karampinis, L., ‘Emerging materiality through dynamic digital conservation’, Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 23 (2021) e00198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00198.
17. Bobinger, M., Schissler der Ältere und der Jüngere (Schwäbische Geschichtsquellen und Forschungen 5), Verlag Die Brigg, Augsburg/Basel (1954).
18. Estácio dos Reis, A., ‘The oldest existing globe in Portugal’, Der Globusfreund. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Globen- und Instrumentenkunde 38 (1990) 57-65.
19. Estácio dos Reis, A., ‘Old globes in Portugal’, Separata. Boletim da Biblioteca da Universidade de Coimbra 42 (1994) 281-298.
20. Gessner, S., ‘The Vopelius-Schissler connection: transmission of knowledge for the design of celestial globes in the 16th century’, Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 104 (2010) 32-42.
21. Gessner, S., ‘«Geometricus et astronomicus faber». Chr. Schissler aus Augsburg als Hersteller eines wenig bekannten großen Himmelsglobus (1575)’, in Weiter sehen. Beiträge zur Frühgeschichte des Fernrohrs und zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte Augsburgs, eds. J. Hamel & M. Korey, Acta Historica Astronomiae, Frankfurt a. M. (2012), 123-154.
22. Gessner, S.; Mesquita e Carmo, A., ‘Le globe céleste de Schissler: enjeux simultanés d’histoire des sciences et de préservation du patrimoine’, in Proceedings of the International Council of Museums (ICOM), ICOM-CC 16th Triennial Conference, Critério - Produção Gráfica, Lisboa (2011).
23. Agisoft Metashape (software), https://www.agisoft.com/ (accessed 2025-05-20).
24. Adobe Photoshop (software), https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html (accessed 2025-05-20).
25. CloudCompare (version 2.13 alpha) [GPL software], http://www.cloudcompare.org/ (accessed 2025-05-20).
26. Matlab 2024a (software), https://www.mathworks.com/ (accessed 2025-05-20).
27. Toomer, G. J. (trans.), Ptolemy’s Almagest, Gerald Duckworth, London (1984).
28. Copernicus, N., De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium, Libri VI, Petreius, Nurenberg (1543).
29. Peters, C. H. F.; Knobel, E. B., Ptolemy's catalogue of stars: a revision of the Almagest, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. (1915).
30. Dekker, E., ‘Conspicuous features on sixteenth century celestial globes’, Der Globusfreund. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Globen- und Instrumentenkunde 43-44 (1995) 77-97.
31. ArcGIS online, https://www.arcgis.com/ (accessed 2025-05-20).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium following no commercial or derivatives, provided the original author and source are credited.
Copyright remains with the authors.




